What products and services do Trace offer for AASB S2 compliance?
Trace's modular products & services allow reporting companies to start with Minimum Viable Compliance and progressively build toward best practice, without replacing systems or redoing foundational work.
Our approach to AASB S2 compliance
Trace is designed to help organisations meet AASB S2 requirements efficiently, without overbuilding systems or creating unnecessary cost.
AASB S2 compliance is a journey. Trace understands the needs of services companies and delivers practical, right-sized solutions for lean teams. Its Minimum Viable Compliance model supports Year One compliance without unnecessary complexity, typically delivering outcomes faster than traditional consulting firms.
Aligned to the AASB S2 workstreams
Our products and services align to the AASB S2 and TCFD pillars:

Delivery Pathways
For each workstream, Trace offers two delivery pathways:
Minimum Viable Compliance (recommended starting point): Focused on achieving Year 1 assurance efficiently and cost-effectively by prioritising essential disclosures and activities.- Focus on what is mandatory under AASB S2
- Prioritise decision useful, auditable disclosures
- Build pragmatic processes that can scale over time
- Avoid over engineering in year one
To read more about Minimum Viable Compliance, watch our short video here.
- Recommended where there are larger gaps, higher scrutiny, or limited internal capability
- Suitable for organisations seeking deeper insight and strategic value
- Builds more robust governance, systems, and integration across the business
All products and services are modular and standardised, allowing us to offer competitive pricing while maintaining consistency and quality.
Technology enabled delivery
All products and services are AI powered today.
Our long term vision is to eliminate the cost and burden of climate compliance so organisations can redirect resources toward building resilient businesses within planetary boundaries.
Using AI we offer-
Instant data extraction and mapping from source documents
-
Emissions calculations aligned to recognised standards
-
Risk mapping and tagging against AASB S2 requirements
-
Version controlled disclosure drafting
-
Audit trail and evidence management
Standardised deliverables, Tailored pathway
We prepare a recommended approach based on:
-
Your reporting timeline
-
Your organisational maturity
-
Your risk profile and assurance expectations
-
Your board and investor scrutiny
Below is a summary of our product and service offering per Workstream.
Workstream: Readiness Assessment
|
Deliverable / activity |
Description and outcome |
Minimum Viable Compliance |
Best Practice Reporting |
|
Digital readiness survey |
Self-assessment survey covering all AASB S2 disclosure requirements, structured across the four pillars (Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics & Targets), including instant outputs |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Automated Readiness Assessment |
Automated RAG-rated Readiness Report showing overall readiness score and scores by pillar, key actions to take, and areas to start, improve, or continue |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Expert analysis |
Trace’s climate specialists will conduct a detailed review of the self-assessment results alongside all supporting documentation provided. This expert analysis complements the automated outputs, providing a more comprehensive assessment. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Detailed readiness Report |
An expert-produced readiness report providing tailored recommendations for closing key gaps and strengthening governance, data, and reporting processes. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Tailored roadmap |
Development of a clear, prioritised roadmap outlining the actions, ownership, and timing required to achieve full AASB S2 compliance. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Draft Review |
One round of draft feedback on identified gaps, where you can add context on additional activities that are being conducted that may not have been captured in the assessment. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Post assessment workshop |
Interactive session with leadership and key stakeholders to introduce AASB S2, review and validate survey results, discuss key challenges, and align on readiness gaps and priorities (90 minutes). |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Target duration |
2 weeks |
4 weeks |
|
Workstream: Governance Review
|
Deliverable / activity |
Description and outcome |
Minimum Viable Compliance |
Best Practice Reporting |
|
Governance checklist |
This checklist will clarify:
|
✔ |
✔ |
|
Document feedback |
Review and marked up comments on up to 50 pages of existing governance policy documents relevant to the management of climate-related risk. (Note that this is feedback, not rewriting). |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Additional policies |
Trace drafts additional governance policies and development of a Climate related Risks and Opportunities policy (20-50 pages, as needed) |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Second round feedback |
2 additional rounds of review by Trace with any final feedback over after changes made |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Summary of findings |
Succinct (5 page) report on any findings identified in the policies for non-urgent updates for compliance and ongoing improvement |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Review call |
Review call, discussing feedback (up to 30 mins) |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Leadership training |
One hour training session on climate risk, climate governance, and common reporting errors, designed for senior leadership and board members |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Target duration |
2 weeks |
4 weeks |
|
Workstream: Climate Risk Assessment
|
Deliverable / activity |
Description and outcome |
Minimum Viable Compliance |
Best Practice Reporting |
|
Document review |
Review of entity specific documentation to inform risk identification and risk rankings |
✔ |
✔✔ |
|
Physical location review |
Review of key regions to identify location specific climate risks |
✔ |
✔✔ |
|
Custom risk management framework |
Alignment of climate risk ranking with existing internal consequence and likelihood scales to support cohesive enterprise risk management |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Scenario analysis |
Development of narratives for a 1.5°C scenario and 3°C scenario for your industry to inform risk assessment |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Risk ranking: Desktop |
Digital survey to collect responses from key personnel ranking risks for likelihood and impact |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Risk ranking: Workshop |
Facilitated workshop session with key personnel to rank risk likelihood and impact |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Qualitative context |
Qualitative risk narratives providing context on potential financial impacts of risks and opportunities |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Quantitative context |
Quantitative risk context using metrics to provide insights into potential financial effects for risk and opportunities |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Resilience Assessment: Overall |
Enterprise-level resilience assessment and recommendations. |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Resilience Assessment: |
Individual resilience assessment and recommendations provided for each material risk. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Methodology |
Documented CRA methodology including assumptions and sign off trail to support assurance requirements |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Climate risk report |
Climate risk report including process, risk ranking, assumptions, and overall assessment outcomes |
✔ |
✔✔ |
|
Draft feedback |
Up to 2 rounds of draft feedback on climate risk report incorporating resilience activities and comments |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Findings review |
Findings review sharing CRA outcomes (up to 60 mins) |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Target Duration |
2 - 4 weeks |
4 - 8 weeks |
|
To learn more about our Climate Risk Assessment approach, please read this article.
Workstream: Transition Planning & Strategy
|
Deliverable / activity |
Description and outcome |
Minimum Viable Compliance (scope 1 & 2 only) |
Best Practice Reporting |
|
Kick off and Ambition review |
Kick of call to discuss decarbonisation to date, key drivers, and review ambition |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Emissions Review: Scope 1 and 2 |
Overview of major Scope 1 and 2 emission sources and drivers from a decarbonisation perspective. |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Direct decarbonisation levers review (scope 1, 2) |
Quantified reduction ranges for all feasible Scope 1, and 2 levers with qualitative cost and effort ratings. |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Emissions Review: Scope 3 |
Overview of major Scope 3 emission sources and drivers from a decarbonisation perspective. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Indirect decarbonisation levers review (Scope 3) |
Quantified reduction ranges for all feasible Scope 3 levers with qualitative cost and effort ratings. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Supplier Scan |
Review of public documentation for up to five largest suppliers to understand their commitments and how this could influence your decarbonisation progress |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Decarbonisation workshop |
Workshop to review and agree on suitable decarbonisation levers, discuss feasibility, and confirm preferred actions. |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Findings report |
Decarbonisation strategy report for internal use, including activities determined reasonable in workshop |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Public decarbonisation roadmap |
Public facing decarbonisation roadmap (five to ten pages) presenting baseline, pathway, and key levers in a clear and credible format. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Target Duration |
3 weeks |
6 weeks |
|
Workstream: Metrics and Targets
|
Deliverable / activity |
Description and outcome |
Minimum Viable Compliance |
Best Practice Reporting |
|
Metric ambition review |
Ambition workshop to test ambition levels across climate risks, opportunities, metrics, and targets, assess tolerance for low risk and high risk outcomes, to ensure targets align with business goals (up to 60 mins) |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Metric 1 – Scope 1, 2, 3 emissions |
See emissions measurement platform pricing |
See carbon accounting software pricing |
|
|
Metric 2 – Climate-related transition risks |
Dry run assessment of exposure, with a documented methodology aligned to the Climate Risk Assessment. |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Metric 3 – Climate-related physical risks |
Dry run assessment of exposure, with a documented methodology aligned to the Climate Risk Assessment. |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Metric 4 – Climate-related opportunities |
Dry run assessment of exposure, with a documented methodology aligned to the Climate Risk Assessment. |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Metric 5 – Capital deployment |
Definition of methodology and boundaries, with a dry run application where data is available. |
✔ |
✔ |
|
Metric 6 – Internal carbon prices and remuneration |
Review of use and disclosure requirements, including 2 page policy / methodology development. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Metric 7 – Other climate risk metrics and targets |
Development of up to 5 additional metrics and review of targets |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Target risk review |
Review over existing climate targets for assessment of low risk and high risk of achievement. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Target duration |
2 weeks |
6 weeks |
|
Workstream: Disclosure Drafting
|
Deliverable / activity |
Description and outcome |
Minimum Viable Compliance |
Best Practice Reporting |
|
Short template |
Template for light AASB S2 report (up to 25 pages) covering qualitative disclosures. Best suited for low to moderate risk industries |
✔ |
✕ |
|
Light feedback |
1 round of Trace feedback over completed AASB S2 template in light report (up to 25 pages) |
✔ |
✕ |
|
Review checklist - Minimum Compliance |
Checklist of key disclosure topics for minimum viable compliance. |
✔ |
✕ |
|
Review checklist - Best Practice reporting |
Checklist of key disclosure topics for best practice reporting. |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Detailed template |
Template for detailed AASB S2 report (up to 60 pages) covering qualitative and quantitative disclosures. Best suited for high risk industries |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Detailed feedback |
2 rounds of Trace feedback over completed AASB S2 template in detailed report (up to 60 pages) |
✕ |
✔ |
|
Optional addition: Report drafted by Trace |
Full report is drafted by Trace. Company to provide up to 2 rounds of feedback over the report with draft comments actioned. |
Optional $ add on |
Optional $ add on |
|
Target duration |
6-8 weeks |
8-12 weeks |
|
Controls & Audit preparation
Across all workstreams, Trace provides:
✅ Methodology documentation
✅ Audit ready workpapers
✅ Disciplined document management and version control
✅ Evidence mapping to AASB S2 paragraphs
✅ AI assisted disclosure drafting with traceable source data
This ensures disclosures are not only compliant, but defensible under external assurance.
Annual reporting requirements
AASB S2 requires annual disclosure. We've summarised our recommended cadence of reporting in the diagram below, depending on your approach: Minimum Viable Compliance or Best Practice.

To learn more about our AASB S2 products & services and get a pricing proposal, please reach out to sales@our-trace.com.